This week was something of a struggle in that Eisner’s text was somewhat convoluted in its reading. I found it interesting, just not particularly an easy read. I think its because of the complex way in which they were trying to explain the topic at hand. For some reason it always seams that when dealing with these types of papers the authors feel the need to add several pages of verbiage and other terms to create a document that really has poor flow throughout. However, once the main focus was gleaned from the paper it allowed me to begin my work on the proposal for our “work of art” projects. I find this to be a fairly interesting and taxing project that should take some serious thought and examination if all areas are to be met.